Hot on e-Bay!
-
I mean, the media shall surely be laying for him to see what he would be up to, re-issue-wise, and for that matter, anything JL related.
-
But in all fairness, it would be a large burden to put on the young
man to try to manage his late father's eminent legacy, and dead celeb street-cred.
-
And while this may place me in the realm of heretic, if Priscilla Presley-who did a superb job of resurrecting Elvis's product quotient after his death-can sell off to an outsider, than in this money really talks whilst bullshit walks world, then anything is
also possible with the Lennon brand.
McCartney has to be happy to place number five in the top-ten
music mogul fortunes at about 700 mill, he certainly can't be too
Originally going for about $30, and only from independent record stores in honour of the most recent Record Store Day, the John Lennon Singles Bag is fetching up and over $50 on e-Bay, perhaps due to its limited release of 7000 units.
-
Although it is rather neato-guido, what with the oversize cardboard "bag," three 45rpm singles-two in pic sleeves-3 post-cards, and large fold-out b&wposter of the bed-in, there is nothing really "rare," here.
-
I mean, would it have hurt for Mz. Ono to throw the hardcore fans a bone with some kind of unreleased material?
-Although it is rather neato-guido, what with the oversize cardboard "bag," three 45rpm singles-two in pic sleeves-3 post-cards, and large fold-out b&wposter of the bed-in, there is nothing really "rare," here.
-
-
The answer to that, I'd guess, is why waste a good opportunity to
make the Lennon-lovers buy the same old, same old, over and over and over-and over again?
-
Besides, come this fall, we shall be seeing-and hearing-lots of
previously unreleased Lennon stuff, and therefore, shelling out again.
make the Lennon-lovers buy the same old, same old, over and over and over-and over again?-
Besides, come this fall, we shall be seeing-and hearing-lots of
previously unreleased Lennon stuff, and therefore, shelling out again.
-
Any who, I got to thinking of what will happen have after Mz. Ono- if she ever does-departs this mortal coil, and the Lennon Legend and money-machine is placed in some other hands.
-
Say or think what you may about Yoko, but one thing she is not, is dumb.
Any who, I got to thinking of what will happen have after Mz. Ono- if she ever does-departs this mortal coil, and the Lennon Legend and money-machine is placed in some other hands.
-
Say or think what you may about Yoko, but one thing she is not, is dumb.-
So, she undoubtedly has a Lennon estate succession plan that may, or may not, include having son Sean O'Lennon take over the day-to day running of the watching of the wheels, and shekels.
-
So, she undoubtedly has a Lennon estate succession plan that may, or may not, include having son Sean O'Lennon take over the day-to day running of the watching of the wheels, and shekels.
-
Perhaps Sean does not even have an interest in carrying the torch.
-I mean, the media shall surely be laying for him to see what he would be up to, re-issue-wise, and for that matter, anything JL related.
-But in all fairness, it would be a large burden to put on the young
man to try to manage his late father's eminent legacy, and dead celeb street-cred.
-
And while this may place me in the realm of heretic, if Priscilla Presley-who did a superb job of resurrecting Elvis's product quotient after his death-can sell off to an outsider, than in this money really talks whilst bullshit walks world, then anything is
also possible with the Lennon brand.
-
Meanwhile, in the land of the living ex-Beatles...although Paul
Meanwhile, in the land of the living ex-Beatles...although Paul
music mogul fortunes at about 700 mill, he certainly can't be too
pleased that he had to go to the Concord Music Group to re-issue
such a seminal-and mega-million selling-Band On The Run.
-
such a seminal-and mega-million selling-Band On The Run.
-
Sure Starbucks and Concord are about right for new PM releases and the ever-growing Macca live catalogue, but BOTR with bonus material?
-
-
Geez, that was a monster album in the 70s, and sells well to this day, so I'm wonderin' why it was not placed with a major label fro the upcoming reissue.
-
Maybe McCartney wanted to much up-front dolleros for a deal with a major, or, could it be that the majors don't think they could sell enough to make their money back?
-
The mind bungles...
No comments:
Post a Comment